CIM Overview
The Continuous Improvement Model (CIM) is based on the idea that student and
teacher success must be a continuous effort. Analyzing data, developing
timelines, quality instruction and frequently assessing students for
understanding are all key parts to the model.
The Continuous Improvement Model is derived from the 8-Step Instructional
Process which was developed by Mary Lehman Barksdale, while teaching third
grade at the Brazosport Independent School District (Texas).
Based on Barksdale's model, teachers and administrators must
- raise expectations for all students;
- create a vision to guide reform;
- develop measurable objectives with timeframes for accomplishing them.
The steps of the Continuous Improvement Model break into four parts of an
instructional cycle called Plan-Do-Check-Act (Deming):
-
Plan
-
Data Disaggregation:
In this step teachers and administrators disaggregate, or analyze, the state
standards assessment and/or standardized test data to identify both students'
and teachers' strengths and weaknesses and to improve teacher instruction and
student learning. Focusing on specific student weaknesses, the teachers and
administrators create a plan for student improvement. Identifying teachers'
strengths and weaknesses enables administrators to provide effective quality
staff development to improve instruction and student learning.
-
Instructional Calendar Development: Based on the students' strengths and
weaknesses, teachers build an instructional calendar that includes all the
standards/skills to be assessed. The calendar should allow additional time for
areas where students are having trouble and be flexible enough to allow for
adjustments.
-
Do
-
Direct the Instructional Focus: Based on the instructional calendar,
teachers teach the targeted skill. The goal here is for quality instruction and
student mastery. Classroom activities should be focused and conducive to
learning by
- providing a warm-up
- highlighting the day's focus
- focusing on new content
- reinforcing new concepts
- surveying student understanding
Effective teaching strategies for instruction have at their core consistently
high-level expectations for students. Additionally, quality instruction
includes
- modeling thinking processes (i.e. think-alouds)
- providing essential vocabulary for subject area
- applying learning to the real world
- using cooperative learning techniques
- using skill reinforcing drills
- teaching test-taking strategies
- celebrating mastery of skills and knowledge
-
Check
-
Assessment:
After teaching the targeted skill, teachers administer a short assessment to
check for student understanding. These assessments should be integrated into
the curriculum and instruction. The assessments should mimic the format of the
state standards assessment. Teacher teams should meet frequently to review
assessment results.
-
Maintenance:
Teachers must continuously work to reinforce skills and knowledge until they
become part of the student's knowledge base.
-
Monitoring: School principals and the instructional coordinator assume
the primary responsibility for monitoring program success. Monitoring practices
include regularly unscheduled classroom visits, one-on-one meetings with
students and teachers to review test scores, celebrating successes, using
surveys to assess the process, the school climate, and stakeholder
satisfaction.
-
Act
-
Tutorials and Enrichment: Based on assessment results, teachers should
provide continuing quality instruction to either build on success or provide
additional instruction. Teaching teams should work together to review progress.
Extensions must be considered as important as tutorial work and provided for
both mastery and non-mastery students. Additional assessments may be given to
check mastery.
To learn more about the Continuous Improvement Model, you can read the following
texts:
-
8 Steps to Student Success: An Educator's Guide to Implementing Continuous
Improvement,
by Mary Lehman Barksdale
-
8-Step Instructional Process Primer - A Continuous Improvement Model,
by Mary Lehman Barksdale (Available Spring 2007)
-
Closing the Achievement Gap: No Excuses, by Patricia Davenport and
Gerald R. Anderson
|